Designed for Taiwan’s GSAT writing tasks—providing A+ level evaluation for both analytical and expressive writing.
This AI grading system is built for senior high school students and Chinese language teachers. It fully understands the depth and breadth required at this stage of writing. For the two major GSAT writing types—analytical writing (focused on logic and argumentation) and expressive writing (focused on emotion and reflection)—it applies distinct evaluation criteria, such as the strength of reasoning or the authenticity of emotional expression. It can read handwritten essays and evaluate them across idea development, organization, and language use, offering feedback aligned with the perspective of official exam graders.
Applicable Scenarios
- Practicing for GSAT writing exams Students who practice weekly essays often wonder: “Is my argumentative essay persuasive enough?” or “Is my narrative too exaggerated?” The assistant provides immediate feedback, such as “Your argument lacks counterexamples” or “The emotional transition feels slightly abrupt.”
- Supporting teachers in grading large volumes of essays When reviewing dozens of long essays, the assistant can perform initial screening—identifying high-level (A) and lower-level (C) work—and generate feedback drafts, allowing teachers to focus on final refinement.
- Helping students improve their grade level Students aiming to move from B+ to A receive concrete guidance, such as: “Incorporating references to classical texts like the Analects could strengthen cultural depth and improve your score.”
User Guide
Step 1: Upload a photo of the handwritten essay Take a clear photo of the student’s essay (either analytical or expressive).
- Strong recognition capability The AI can interpret messy or stylized handwriting and infer unclear characters based on context.
Step 2: Specify the writing type and prompt (recommended) For more accurate evaluation, indicate the type and topic, such as: “This is an analytical essay on ‘Forgotten Skills’” or “This is an expressive essay on ‘Reflections on Gaps.’”
Step 3: Receive A+ level evaluation You will receive a detailed grading report, including:
- Grade level: A+, A, B+, etc. (aligned with GSAT scoring bands)
- Four-dimension radar analysis:
- Idea development (25%)
- Organization (25%)
- Language use (25%)
- Spelling and format (15%)
- Type-specific feedback:
- Analytical writing: Focus on logical consistency, argument strength, and originality
- Expressive writing: Focus on imagery, rhetorical devices, and emotional depth
Features
- Dual-track evaluation system for analytical and expressive writing The assistant applies different criteria depending on the writing type. Analytical essays are evaluated for logic and reasoning, while expressive essays are assessed for imagination and emotional resonance—reflecting the core requirements of GSAT writing.
- In-depth literary analysis Senior high writing demands not only clarity but also stylistic sophistication. The assistant can identify rhetorical techniques (such as parallelism and contrast), provide positive reinforcement, and point out issues like inappropriate references or forced emotional expression.
- Accurate spelling detection While it does not automatically correct errors, it highlights incorrect character usage (e.g., confusion between similar words) and incorporates them into the evaluation, reinforcing students’ attention to fundamentals.
